Why Harvard
scientist think, This object is an alien spacecraft.
Narrator: We have a mysterious new kid on the block.
Astronomers call it Oumuamua. Which in Hawaiian, roughly
translates to "first time visitor from far away." Oumuamua is
the first interstellar object ever detected in our solar system. Astronomers
discovered it in 2017 with the Pan-STARRS1 telescope. And like all grand
discoveries, it has raised more questions than it answers.
Where did it come
from?
What's it made of?
And yes, even the
ultimate query, is it aliens?
That's what two Harvard astrophysicists posed in a recent
paper, suggesting that Oumuamua could be some type of alien spacecraft. And
when we spoke with one of them, the idea didn't sound as far-fetched as you
might think. Loeb: I prefer to adopt the maxim of Sherlock Holmes that if you
rule out the impossible, whatever remains, as improbable as it is, must be the
truth.
Narrator: Now a good rule of thumb is that aliens are always
the least likely answer. But here's the thing, the more reasonable explanation
right now isn't panning out. Most astronomers think that Oumuamua is probably a
stray comet from another stellar system.
The only problem is that it doesn't look like any comet
we've ever seen, because it appears to lack that iconic tail. Loeb: There was
an anomaly seen in the data. And it cannot be explained by the most
conventional explanation, which in this case is a cometary outgassing. And so
we propose an alternative interpretation which is the only one I can think of.
Narrator: But it seems
xtreme to assume aliens just because Oumuamua doesn't look like a comet, right?
Not when the Harvard scientists accounted for another peculiarity. As Oumuamua travelled
through our solar system, it didn't follow the normal path of a typical comet
under the sun's gravity.
Rather, it slightly shifted off course, which couldn't be explained
by gravity alone. Something else, some unknown force was also at play,
manipulating the object's behavior. Loeb: I cannot think of any other
possibility other than the outgassing that we find in comets, which seems to be
ruled out because we don't see a cometary tail, or the pressure from the
sunlight. There is no other proposal on the table right now.
Narrator: Pressure from sunlight. It works similarly to how
wind pushes against a sail on a boat. So too can sunlight push against a
spacecraft to propel it through space. Incidentally, we call the see spacecraft
solar sails. There's just one catch. Pressure from sunlight is extremely light.
Lighter than the weight of a fly on your hand. Which means in order for it to
be effective, solar sails also have to be extremely light and thin. In 2010,
for example, Japan's space agency launched its Ikaros solar sail, which only
weighed 1.1 pounds.
Reason.
But it eventually
managed to travel over 65 million miles from Earth on just sunlight alone. And
it's this type of force that the Harvard scientists think could be propelling
Oumuamua too. Of course, that's If it's an alien made sail in the first place.
Loeb: Well first of all, I am not confident that this is the correct
interpretation because we don't have enough data.
And so this is one possibility. I would highly recommend people
to read the paper. If they have a better idea, they should publish it.
Narrator: And as always, not everyone agrees with Loeb's hypothesis. Weryk: I
think that their explanation, I think it's in contrast with what the data says.
You know, we did consider that possibility in our own paper, which was
published earlier, and we dismissed it as not being physically valid.
You know again, there's no reason to think Oumuamua is
anything but a natural object. Narrator: That's Rob Weryk, who first discovered
Oumuamua in 2017. Weryk: So we think Oumuamua still has ice and the sublimating
ice gives it a small tiny kick that gravity alone wouldn't account for, but
that the dust it has is much larger than what comets typically have.
And so we just don't
see that from the ground. Narrator: And yes, in all probability, he's right.
Oumuamua is a natural object, like a comet or asteroid. But neither Weryk nor Loeb
can know for sure without more data. And sadly, Oumuamua is on its way out of
the solar system beyond the reach of our telescopes.
So the best bet for solving this mystery? Weryk: So for
Oumuamua itself, it's basically gone, it's too faint to see from the ground.
There's no way we could send a spacecraft mission, so we really have to find a
second object.
That would help answer a lot of questions that we don't
know. You know, I'm very interested in finding a second one. It'd be nice if I
found them all. Narrator: And Loeb already has some ideas on where to look
next. Loeb: There should be quite a lot of them right now in the solar system.
And some of them could be trapped by Jupiter and the sun that act as a fishing
net. And so some of these interstellar objects are bound to this solar system after
the first passage.
Narrator: That's
right. Some of these interstellar objects might be right here in our solar
system, trapped, and waiting to be found. It looks like astronomers may have
more fascinating discoveries to come.
0 comments: